Like I say, our government is totally disorganized and overbloated. Law
enforcement should be part of DoJ not Treasury. But, we gotta waste money
somehow so we get a mishmash of a hodgepodge. 'nuff said - except to note that I
wanted a chance to live enough that I illegally carried a .38 special for most
of that year and slept with it under the pillow. Surrender is for victims. I
gave up being a victim and liked the feeling.
{o.o}
On 2014-10-05 06:27, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
That is because the secret service is part of the treasury department oddly
enough. Even though they are most know for protecting the president they are
actually a law enforcement agency.
-- Sent from my HP Pre3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Oct 5, 2014 2:54 AM, jdow <[email protected]> wrote:
If credit card fraud was involved you might check with the Secret Service. At
least in the mid 80s credit card fraud was investigated by the Secret Service.
I've no freaking idea why; but, during an investigation about some online
stalking featuring me as one of the victims credit card fraud was involved. I
was interviewed about it by a Secret Service agent and an FBI agent
concurrently. Both were just a touch out of their depth. Sigi Kluger was
ultimately prosecuted for the CC fraud, not the stalking, not the death threats,
not the bodily harm (chop me up and feed me to his dog) but CC fraud that was
small amounts over a full year. VERY few women stayed with McGraw-Hill's "BIX"
or "Byte Information eXchange" through that year. I was too damn stubborn to be
run out. But - damn - CC fraud was the Secret Service's domain? Washington DC
was hopelessly screwed up even then.
{^_^} Joanne
On 2014-10-04 21:26, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
> you may be right Interpol's economic crimes division might be the
> right way to go Ive never considered that before.
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Bill Maidment <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> There used to be an organisation called Interpol to deal with international
crime. I haven't heard anything recent about them; do they still exist?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Bill Maidment
>>
>> Interpol still exists, they've a web site hat
>> https://www.interpol.int/. Since we've gone way off this mailing
>> list's announced purpose, I'll stop here.
>
