On 05/23/2015 04:02 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 4:20 PM, ToddAndMargo <[email protected]> wrote:
On 05/23/2015 01:10 PM, Jamie Duncan wrote:

How far back should red hat port fixes? The policy is public and adhered
to...

They should just follow their word. They state 2020.
Support means support. Freezing all the bugs in
is not support.

And Red Hat has seemed to have lost interest in 6
now that they have 7.

Here is another example:

"livecd-tools" is horrible. The stick you create refuses
to boot in most computers. The "persistence" is trashed.
There is a 3GB barrier on ext3 partitions. Yada, yada, yada.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220107

"I'll make updates for specific problems, but I'm not
going to backport anything to rhel6."

In other words, don't hold your breath.

BCL then explains: "I'll work on fixing those specific things when I
get a chance. But there won't be a total rebase of the code, specific
fixes only."

It's, again, an RFE bug...


Hi Tim,

  And BCL also said:

       "Status: CLOSED WONTFIX"

  I tagged the bug as RFE because I was being polite.
I have found that sometimes it is better for them to discover
it is a bug.

-T

Wwwwwwhat !?!?!?!?  I can be polite!  :-)

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to