On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 07:52:29AM -0400, James M. Pulver wrote: > The bigger issue for me is we support one browser across platforms, > and that is Firefox. We have tooling using the CCK and puppet to > support Firefox. Changing supported browsers is a "*BIG DEAL*". > _Adding_ a supported browser is a "big deal". > > So it's very useful to have an option to have things work in Firefox.
Ok, I see. The issue is the people who cannot handle the concept of using different browsers for accessing different web sites. Before web 2.0, as near as 5-10 years ago, it was not a concept, it was a fact of life. The idea of one universal browser for universal use with every web site, on every occasion, with every screen size, for every user, every day - it is a mirage. K.O. > > James Pulver > CLASSE Computer Group > Cornell University > > On 09/24/2015 03:17 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: > >On 09/23/2015 10:21 PM, Brandon Vincent wrote: > >>On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:01 PM, ToddAndMargo > >><[email protected]> wrote: > >>>I like Firefox. Been with them since the beginning. > >>>They have fix countless bugs for me. Creates > >>>a lot of loyalty. > >> > >>Firefox is great if you don't want to use the latest flash player. I'm > >>suggesting you use Chromium because the solution you proposed does not > >>sandbox or isolate flash from the rest of the browser. Security > >>vulnerabilities in Flash will have a greater chance of doing harm on > >>Firefox than in the native Google Chrome/Chromium. > >> > >>Brandon Vincent > >> > > > >good point -- Konstantin Olchanski Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow! Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada
