On 03/05/2019 17:51, Olek Proskurowski wrote: Unless IBM decides to charge "modest" download fee.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.gnu.org_licenses_gpl-2Dfaq.en.html-23DoesTheGPLAllowDownloadFee&d=DwIGaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=gd8BzeSQcySVxr0gDWSEbN-P-pgDXkdyCtaMqdCgPPdW1cyL5RIpaIYrCn8C5x2A&m=Z__OEEHQf3OcXZmcy1LsYtDdPjrt5r3uCreTxxqownw&s=1GuSaqR3SwwBTXPzoFLxhfhHB3nG2lN9SCtSyrTGMBg&e=<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.gnu.org_licenses_gpl-2Dfaq.en.html-23DoesTheGPLAllowDownloadFee&d=DwMCaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=gd8BzeSQcySVxr0gDWSEbN-P-pgDXkdyCtaMqdCgPPdW1cyL5RIpaIYrCn8C5x2A&m=lBbceI-hYbmg7M7iQCy0jSTRdX_KR13NWeCKNFXZ9L8&s=D7VTnT7pQJmCipExcwCuy4biNxXRSZ4iAj6O8CTf-9Y&e=> Well, even then, I don't think it would invalidate the principle that the GPL (and other open source licence) source could be redistributed (and modified) freely once initially downloaded by someone, anyone, with legitimate access to it.
