On 1/22/21 7:20 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
I had not heard the history of SystemD in any detail. What, if any, were the software engineering and design justifications for SystemD? I recall some vague mentions of "designs for the future" (evidently including deployment under distributed wide area network type 1 hypervisors, and the general issues of distributed wide area network "cloud computing" as a "service") or some such, but in practical terms, I did not understand the need for the massive changes and reconfigurations necessitated by the continued SystemD intrusive deployment. By comparison, to me this is not the same as the Tomasulo algorithm and reservation stations that are now commonplace on many general purpose CPU architectures and that met (and meets) a real need.On 1/22/21 5:20 PM, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 4:01 PM Yasha Karant <ykar...@gmail.com <mailto:ykar...@gmail.com>> wrote:> > Was Torvalds behind SystemD, etc.? Just curious. Are you joking?systemd is the creation of Red Hat employee (and professional idiot) Lennart Poettering. Worst thing that ever happened to Linux.
-- Orion Poplawski Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
