We use EXT4 mostly. We find it to be more robust for lab machines, and more efficient for VMs. XFS is limited to cases where its more advanced features are useful. We treat our user facing systems as being "disposable", if they develop a software/filesystem issue we usually wipe and reinstall rather than try to fix same. Important storage is mounted from separate storage servers.
- Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] XFS vs Ext4 Patrick Riehecky
- Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] XFS vs Ext4 Alec Habig
- Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] XFS vs Ext4 Laura Hild
- Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] XFS vs Ext4 Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] XFS vs ... Laura Hild
- Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] XF... Nico Kadel-Garcia
- Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS... Yasha Karant
- Re: XFS vs Ext4 Laura Hild
- Re: XFS vs Ext4 Paul Robert Marino
- Re: XFS vs Ext4 Patrick J. LoPresti
- Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] XFS vs Ext4 Jose Marques
- Re: XFS vs Ext4 Konstantin Olchanski
- Re: XFS vs Ext4 Edward Zuniga
- Re: XFS vs Ext4 Edward Zuniga
- Re: XFS vs Ext4 Konstantin Olchanski
- Re: XFS vs Ext4 Miles ONeal
- Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] XFS vs Ext4 Patrick Riehecky