Hi,
Just tried looking for it with yum, and nope, currently, nobody has it
in any of their extra repositories.
Am I willing to put it in?
Only if somebody else does it, with the promise that *they* will do the
security updates. And even then, I'll have to think about it.
I've done this before and the pain is still there. Browsers are one of
the most visible tools used, and one of the most complex. The only
thing more visible and complex is the desktop. So any little bug get's
seen and sent your way. That includes font changes, bad websites,
missing libraries, plug-ins not working.
OK, I think I've expressed my view of not wanting to do it myself.
Either way, it won't make it into SL 5.0. It's too major of a program
to go in this close to release.
Troy
Kuang-Chun Cheng wrote:
I'm still using SL4.4, don't have SL5 beta yet. But I think you can try
yum --enablerepo=* list | grep -i seamonkey
to see if somebody have have seamonkey ready for you.
Regards
KC
On 4/20/07, Paul A. Rombouts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have noticed that seamonkey is missing from RHEL5 and from SL5 beta.
Call me old fashioned, but I still prefer the old style integrated
internet application suite that Mozilla used to be and that is continued
in seamonkey.
It should be possible to take a src rpm from one of the Fedora extras
repos and compile that for SL5. Of course I can always do that for
myself, but it would be a lot more convenient if seamonkey was part of
the SL5 distribution.
Anybody else feel this way?
--
Paul A. Rombouts
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________
