Re: Firefox 4?

[Todd And Margo Chester]

On 06/02/2011 03:30 PM, John H. Outlan CPA wrote: On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Alexander Hunt <alexander.d.h...@googlemail.com> wrote: On 06/02/2011 04:44 AM, Hugo Berus wrote: Hi, On 2 June 2011 11:37, Dr Andrew C Aitchison <a.c.aitchi...@dpmms.cam.ac.uk> wrote: My feeling is that Red Hat Firefox is too far behind the curve for bugs to get fixed. That, and Google will stop support for firefox 3.6 eventually, according to this blogpost http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/our-plans-to-support-modern-browsers.html (I need to use Google Apps for work related stuff) H.G. I've been using the version from the remi repo for over a month now with no issues that I have noticed. It also needs a newer version of xulrunner  installed with it and I think I found that in the remi repo too. alex I've been using FF4 from here, with no issues for 2 months (leighlinux's repo) http://scientificlinuxforum.org/index.php?showtopic=212 Hi John, I moved from Mozilla's binaries to the repo you recommended    http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/leigh123linux/firefox4/    http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/leigh123linux/firefox4/epel-firefox4.repo and it fixed up the problems with 64 bit FF recognizing my Flash plugin.  The only problem was that I did not immediately realize that this repo called Firefox /usr/bin/firefox4.  I missed the "4".  Java and pdf plugins now work too.  :-) Thank you! -T