On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Todd And Margo Chester < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 03:30 PM, John H. Outlan CPA wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Alexander Hunt < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 06/02/2011 04:44 AM, Hugo Berus wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 2 June 2011 11:37, Dr Andrew C Aitchison<[email protected]> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> My feeling is that Red Hat Firefox is too far >> behind the curve for bugs to get fixed. >> >> That, and Google will stop support for firefox 3.6 eventually, >> according to this >> blogposthttp://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/our-plans-to-support-modern-browsers.html >> >> (I need to use Google Apps for work related stuff) >> >> H.G. >> >> I've been using the version from the remi repo for over a month now >> with no issues that I have noticed. It also needs a newer version of >> xulrunner installed with it and I think I found that in the remi repo too. >> alex >> > > > I've been using FF4 from here, with no issues for 2 months (leighlinux's > repo) > > http://scientificlinuxforum.org/index.php?showtopic=212 > > > Hi John, > > I moved from Mozilla's binaries to the repo you recommended > > http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/leigh123linux/firefox4/ > > http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/leigh123linux/firefox4/epel-firefox4.repo > > and it fixed up the problems with 64 bit FF recognizing my Flash > plugin. The only problem was that I did not immediately > realize that this repo called Firefox /usr/bin/firefox4. I missed > the "4". Java and pdf plugins now work too. :-) > > Thank you! > -T > > > > Todd, most welcome....LeighLinux123 is a Fedora Forum Admin, and he was active with us for a while....but those packages have worked fine for me. I'm glad it helped. !
