On Thursday 30 June 2011 12:30:08 Alexander Hunt wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not seeing any issue with threading here; all of the subject lines > in Yashas emails are relevant to the topic in the body. Just for info I > use Thunderbird as well, but the sl-security version. > > Regards to all, > > Alex > Here is the offending header portion:
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: How to use a local SL 6 printer with VirtualBox MS Win XP Pro References: <545430358.74671.1309378877083.javamail.r...@linzimmb05o.imo.intelink.gov> <[email protected]><[email protected]> --> In-reply-to: <[email protected]> <--- Sender: [email protected] Precedence: list ---- It's just good practice to create a new email and not reply wiping the information out, as it not all email clients work in the same manner. Much like sending HTML messages to a listserv. /Dan > snip: > > I wasn't going to nitpick but as this is the second time in as many days I > have noticed it, can you please start a new thread(Subject) with your > questions? > > I don't know what is happening, but my guess is you are replying to a > thread > and just changing the subject. > > Examples: > In Kmail this subject is being threaded under the original "ntp-perl" > subject > and another(Your USB3 question) is in the "Virtualization question" > subject. > > On 06/30/2011 10:13 AM, Beartooth Comcast wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, Yasha Karant wrote: > >> What is the list etiquette concerning interspersed replies (post 1 > >> paragraph A, post 2 reply after A, post 1 paragraph B, post 2 reply > >> after B, etc., with recursive iteration)? Such an approach often > >> provides real information indexing issues with threaded lists. > >> > >> I use IA-32 Linux Thunderbird current (3.1.11); [....] > > > > How committed are you to Tbird? I've been unable to find an rpm > > for Pan that doesn't hit dependency hell with SL; if there is one, you > > might want to give it a try instead. >
