Oh no worries :) Just a copy paste from the subnet calculator site. :) On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Howard, Chris <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, I’m convinced.**** > > Sorry to put you through that.**** > > Beautifully displayed, BTW.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Jeremy Wellner [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, January 30, 2012 1:44 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Multiple Routes**** > > ** ** > > Pretty sure it does. We've gotten our Mac 10.6 servers connected with > similar settings.**** > > ** ** > > Address: 10.1.0.0 00001010.00000001.000 00000.00000000 > Netmask: 255.255.224.0 = 19 11111111.11111111.111 00000.00000000 > > **** > > Wildcard: 0.0.31.255 00000000.00000000.000 11111.11111111 > =>**** > > Network: 10.1.0.0/19 00001010.00000001.000 00000.00000000 (Class > A) > > **** > > Broadcast: 10.1.31.255 00001010.00000001.000 11111.11111111 > HostMin: 10.1.0.1 00001010.00000001.000 00000.00000001 > > **** > > HostMax: 10.1.31.254 00001010.00000001.000 11111.11111110 > Hosts/Net: 8190 (Private Internet > <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1918.txt>) > > **** > > ** ** > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Howard, Chris <[email protected]> wrote:* > *** > > That netmask on the 10.1.0.0 **** > > **** > > are you sure that covers 10.1.16.x ?**** > > **** > > I’m not sure the leftmost 19 bytes does the job.**** > > But you are doing stuff that I’ve never done.**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* Jeremy Wellner [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, January 30, 2012 1:23 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Multiple Routes**** > > **** > > Hi Guys! > > **** > > ** ** >
