On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 16:20 -0700, Henrique Junior wrote: > Hello, Volker > I'm already a Fedora packager (not an experient one) and I'd love to > put ntop in EPEL (it is in EPEL for EL5). The problem in maintain ntop > in EPEL6 is that Fedora now uses systemd to manage our services > instead of sysv. It is a Fedora policy to keep only one spec file and > that spec is not compatible with EL6 anymore.
This is certainly no policy and would be impossible in many cases. Volker > That is why I believe that RPMForge is the better option. > I'm open to ideas to make this package as useful as possible. > > > > -- > Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior > http://about.me/henriquejunior > > > ______________________________________________________________ > From: Volker Fröhlich <[email protected]> > To: Henrique Junior <[email protected]> > Cc: Scientific Linux Users <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 5:08 PM > Subject: Re: ntop for EL6 > > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 11:56 -0700, Henrique Junior wrote: > > Hi, list > > I've created some ntop (5.0-2) RPMs for EL6[1] and I have > plans to > > submit it to RPMForge, but, before I do so, I'd like to test > it. > > Dear Henrique? > > Have you considered to contribute to EPEL and/or Fedora > directly? That'd > be the best approach, because most people could profit from > your work. > You could maintain the EL branches for ntop, if Sven Lankes > doesn't like > to. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers > > Volker Fröhlich > > > I'd love if the network administration guys here could give > it a try > > and send me some feedback. > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > [1] - http://upload.lonelyspooky.com/rpm/EL6/ > > > > -- > > Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior > > http://about.me/henriquejunior > > > > >
