This isn't devtoolset specific, but if someone were to get the SRPMs for devtoolset-2 Beta (by using a RHEL license), and were to recompile them would they be able to redistribute them?
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Connie Sieh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 14 May 2013, Graham Allan wrote: > > Thanks, this is wonderful! I wonder how I managed to miss that? >> > > I forgot to announce it. Will do so soon. In class this week. > > -Connie Sieh > > > >> Graham >> >> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:07:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote: >> >>> The Scientific Linux build is available at: >>> >>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.**org/linux/scientific/6x/** >>> external_products/devtoolset/<http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/external_products/devtoolset/> >>> >>> Pat >>> >>> On 05/14/2013 12:04 PM, Graham Allan wrote: >>> >>>> I was just wondering if this ever went anywhere? Obviously I >>>> appreciate the "no promises" part :-) Was it too much of a >>>> nightmare to build? >>>> >>>> I saw that CentOS got to the stage of having a test build >>>> available >>>> (http://people.centos.org/tru/**devtools/<http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools/>) >>>> though I >>>> haven't looked at it. >>>> >>>> Graham >>>> >>>> On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding wrote: >>>> >>>>> Awesome. This should be really useful for us (finally a modern era >>>>> compiler on RHEL supported by Redhat). Let me know if you want any >>>>> beta testers. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Connie Sieh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as >>>>>>> part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://access.redhat.com/**knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_** >>>>>>> Developer_Toolset/<https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for >>>>>>> Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I have. Working on releasing it. It is a bit more complicated to >>>>>> compile >>>>>> than the standard SL. Have to modify the build system to handle it. >>>>>> No >>>>>> promises of course (disclaimer). >>>>>> >>>>> >>
