But you don't need a license to get them they are all on Red Hat's public FTP server along with all the other SRPMS for every other free speech or open source piece of software they support. Really the FTP site is the safe bet for that because they won't post SRPM's for any proprietary code on their public FTP server but the ones you get off of access.redhat.com may include proprietary code.
-- Sent from my HP Pre3
On Jul 16, 2013 13:58, Yi Ding <[email protected]> wrote:
This isn't devtoolset specific, but if someone were to get the SRPMs for devtoolset-2 Beta (by using a RHEL license), and were to recompile them would they be able to redistribute them?
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Connie Sieh <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2013, Graham Allan wrote:I forgot to announce it. Will do so soon. In class this week.
Thanks, this is wonderful! I wonder how I managed to miss that?
-Connie Sieh
Graham
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:07:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:
The Scientific Linux build is available at:
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/external_products/devtoolset/
Pat
On 05/14/2013 12:04 PM, Graham Allan wrote:
I was just wondering if this ever went anywhere? Obviously I
appreciate the "no promises" part :-) Was it too much of a
nightmare to build?
I saw that CentOS got to the stage of having a test build
available (http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools/) though I
haven't looked at it.
Graham
On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding wrote:
Awesome. This should be really useful for us (finally a modern era
compiler on RHEL supported by Redhat). Let me know if you want any
beta testers.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Connie Sieh <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as
part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x:
https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/
I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for
Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc.
I have. Working on releasing it. It is a bit more complicated to compile
than the standard SL. Have to modify the build system to handle it. No
promises of course (disclaimer).
