Hello everyone, I had made small contributions to scikit-image during January 2016 during my initial days of learning Image Processing. It was really fun and I am thankful to the community.
I am not sure if this is the right place to talk about it, but a lot of times I have witnessed reviewers leave a little comment after reviewing the whole PR, and it is more or less about "some style issues. :)". It should be better for the reviewer to focus more on the implementation of the PR and leave the style issues to a bot. Thinking this in mind, a while ago, I created a Github Integration called PEP8 Speaks which automatically reviews the code style and comments on the Pull Request. It is written in Python and is open source. Github - https://github.com/orkohunter/pep8speaks Few pointers about it: 1. The bot puts all its efforts in not being annoying. It makes a single comment (within seconds), and keeps updating it as the user updates the PR. 2. It supports all of the configurations of pycodestyle (formerly known as pep8)[1]. So, line length, specific error ignores, etc. are all possible and can be customized. 3. The bot upon asking, can suggest a diff of changes and/or create a PR against that branch with the fixes. Few users of the integration include SunPy and scikit-learn-contrib. I would appreciate any feedback from the scikit-image community about the idea or the integration. Keenly looking forward to the discussion. [1]. https://github.com/PyCQA/pycodestyle Thank you. -- Himanshu Mishra Third Year Undergraduate Mathematics and Computing IIT Kharagpur https://orkohunter.net
_______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
