Hi Himanshu, The bot looks really nice! What would be the pre-requisites from our side to deploy it?
@scikit-image/core, I'd vote to give it a try. What do you think about 3-4 months probation period for the bot? During the period we could evaluate how well it supplements our current practices, and how the contributors are responding. Regards, Egor 2017-03-21 2:08 GMT+03:00 Stefan van der Walt <stef...@berkeley.edu>: > This also came across my radar today: > > https://landscape.io/ > > Stéfan > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017, at 14:33, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > > Hi Himanshu > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017, at 12:24, Himanshu Mishra wrote: > > I am not sure if this is the right place to talk about it, but a lot of > times I have witnessed reviewers leave a little comment after reviewing the > whole PR, and it is more or less about "some style issues. :)". It should > be better for the reviewer to focus more on the implementation of the PR > and leave the style issues to a bot. Thinking this in mind, a while ago, I > created a Github Integration called PEP8 Speaks which automatically reviews > the code style and comments on the Pull Request. It is written in Python > and is open source. Github - https://github.com/orkohunter/pep8speaks > > > I've been wanting to put something like this in place for a while; so, if > you're willing to help out, we'd be grateful. > > We've also looked at Code Climate before; do you know how your proposed > solution compares? > > Thanks! > Stéfan > > > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-image mailing list > scikit-image@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image > >
_______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
