2011/11/2 Andreas Mueller <[email protected]>: > Hi everybody. > When I commited something today that I thought fixed an inconsistency in the > docs, > Mathieu pointed out that the cache_size parameter was removed from the SVM > functions. (It seems that it was still in the .fit method of the SVM) > > What was the reason for the removal? > It seems that the cache size has a strong impact on runtimes in LibSVM, > according to the lasvm paper by Bottou et al. >
+1 for re-adding it and documenting it in the docstring (also add a smoke test to ensure that future removal won't go unnoticed). -- Olivier http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA® Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
