On 04/17/2012 03:28 PM, Mathieu Blondel wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Andreas Mueller
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> This way people who don't read the doc (the majority of the users)
> will not fall in the libsvm-gives-different-results trap and
will have
> the tools to not fall in the statistical inconsistency trap if they
> make the effort to read the doc.
>
+ .5
+1
And we could add a warning in grid_search.py:
if not getattr(clf, "scale_C", True):
warning.warning("scale_C=False is not recommended when using grid
search: see http:// for a discussion")
If you would like the opinion of user (i.e. me) I think this is the best
solution for intuitive use of the Lib. And having scale_C=False as default.
Mathieu
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
