On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 03:35:26PM +0300, Dimitrios Pritsos wrote: > If you would like the opinion of user (i.e. me) I think this is the best > solution for intuitive use of the Lib. And having scale_C=False as > default.
For small number of samples, _it does not work_. Period, there is not libsvm or not libsvm convention debate. That's how Alex and I found out the problem. We realized the theoretical implications in terms of statistical estimator later. I realize that all the people voicing their opinion in favor of following libsvm's choice probably have a lot of samples, and thus do not care, but many people are not in this situation. Gael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
