On 10/06/2012 03:04 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 04:41:19PM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote: >>> I tried to go through the timeline and see which commits we would >>> want too cherry-pick but that didn't seem to practical. >>> Not sure what the best way to go forward is. >>> Should we just search the individual commits that where mentioned above? >> My gut feeling would be to branch and then cherry-pick individual commits >> in a fairly manual way. It might a bit tedious from a >> version-control/merging point of view. I suggest that I do this tomorrow >> (I can do it, to remove load from you). > Branching and cherry-picking done! I push a 0.12.X branch. It was indeed > tedious. > > I'd like people to have a look at it, and test it, but not push to it. > Give me feedback on the mailing list, if anything looks wrong or missing. > The git-foo to keep the cherry-picking not conflicting is almost too high > for me, so I'd rather be the only one doing pushes on this branch for > now. > > If everything looks good, we can cut a release and do the binaries > tomorrow. > One other small thing: the docs don't build cleanly because somewhere in stochastic_gradient.py the ``classes_`` attribute isn't escaped correctly.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
