Olivier,
I like the plan of proceeding like we did at the last PyCon. It seemed to
work well: there were twelve survey respondents regarding my tutorial, and
the feedback was also overwhelmingly positive.
I'll plan to put together a new intro proposal, which I'll base on the last
PyCon tutorial as well as the first-half of our SciPy tutorial. The
abstract deadline is Sept 15; I'll send you a draft early next week so that
you can give feedback and so that we won't have overlapping material.
Jake
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Olivier Grisel <[email protected]>wrote:
> Apparently there is nobody else interested.
>
> So Jake how shall we proceed? Do you want to submit an introductory
> tutorial on machine learning with scikit-learn, I submit the advanced
> one and we act as Teach Assistant to each other sessions as we did
> last year? Or do you want to do more of a combined submission where we
> both teach in the two sessions?
>
> BTW, I recently received the feedback from last year's session. Only 2
> people answered the feedback survey but both were quite happy.
>
> Title: Advanced Machine Learning with scikit-learn
>
> Rating answers followed by response to the open-ended question "Do you
> have any additional comments about this tutorial or suggestions for
> improvement?".
>
> Aw Po OK Go Ex Avg Question (1.00 <= Average <= 5.00, based on
> 1=Awful, 2=Poor, 3=OK, 4=Good, 5=Excellent)
> -- -- -- -- -- --- --------
>
> 0 0 0 0 2 5.00 The tutorial content quality
> 0 0 0 1 1 4.50 The tutorial content being presented in a form
> you could easily understand
> 0 0 0 0 2 5.00 The tutorial content relative to your expectations
> 0 0 0 0 2 5.00 The handout and sample files (if applicable)
> 0 0 0 0 2 5.00 The instructor(s), overall
> 0 0 0 0 2 5.00 The instructor's preparation
> 0 0 0 1 1 4.50 The instructor's teaching ability
> 0 0 0 1 1 4.50 The tutorial's success at helping you learn
> significant new skills
> 0 0 0 0 2 5.00 How well the tutorial was adapted to or handled
> the size of the class
> 0 0 0 1 1 4.50 The internet connection during the tutorial
> 0 0 0 1 1 4.50 The amount of room at your table
> 0 0 0 0 2 5.00 Overall satisfaction (value for time & money)
> 0 0 1 1 0 3.50 How was the speed of the tutorial?
> 0 0 1 1 0 3.50 How was the difficulty level of the tutorial?
>
> Do you have any additional comments about this tutorial or
> suggestions for improvement? - Open-Ended Response
>
> EXCEPTIONALLY effective use of iPython notebooks. Thank you for
> covering this topic, I used to have to implemented SVM classifiers and
> such in C++ when I was a researcher, nice to know that if I ever go
> back to it it's already all there in Python.
>
> --
> Olivier
> http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
> Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
> and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
> tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Scikit-learn-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
