On 10/18/2013 09:34 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote: > On 09/25/2013 05:56 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote: >> 2013/9/25 Lars Buitinck <[email protected]>: >>> 2013/9/25 Olivier Grisel <[email protected]>: >>>> I don't remember who first did the upload of the 0.14.1 release but it >>>> is indeed very possible that there was a glitch in the release process >>>> and the first upload was messed up and that an override was required >>>> quickly after the first upload. >>> Wasn't that the Reuters issue? The out-of-core text classification >>> example was downloading the Reuters text corpus into the source >>> directory instead of scikit_learn_data and that wound up in a tarball, >>> making it huge (and non-free). Not sure if that was 0.14.1. >> Maybe yes, indeed. >> >> >> Unsurprisingly, "stealth upgrades" are a known issue and should be reported to the macports user list. Lionel, would you do us the favor of reporting there? (also, as a quick fix, they suggest changing the checksum in your ports file)
Thanks! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
