On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 06:04:58PM +0900, Mathieu Blondel wrote: > I think 1000 citations is a bit too much to ask. We should probably > update the FAQ with something more reasonable, like say 200 citations. > That said, I agree that the citation threshold is just an indicator. > For example, SAG and AdaGrad, which are considerely considered for > inclusion, have around 75 and 250 citations currently.
I agree. We should ammend this sentence to say that if the paper is an clear-cut improvement on top of a very used method, it should be examinded. > Perhaps scikit-learn needs to strengthen and formalise its support > for external related projects that adopt its API design to > implement less established techniques. The listing > at https://github.com/scikit-learn/ > scikit-learn/wiki/Third-party-projects-and-code-snippets lacks > glamour, and could be easier to find and navigate. > +1 +1 > We need to bring this page to the main documentation and make it more sexy. Good with me. G ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
