Hi Artem, I've taken a look at your proposal. I think this is an
interesting contribution, but I suspect your proposal is far too ambitious:
- The proposal doesn't well account for the need to receive reviews and
alter the PR in accordance. This is especially so because you are
developing a new variant of the API which means that even if the algorithm
works perfectly you won't get a free green light.
- With an implementation of one or two algorithms two algorithms, it
would be much better to add good examples of their utility and their
features to the example gallery than to implement more algorithms.
Developing good examples takes time too (and the reviewers are just as
picky).
- You will need to package your contributions into manageable PRs, and
ideally after each is merged, the overall project should still be usable
(well-tested, documented, etc.). So the documentation will, at least in
some measure need to be integrated.
- As Gaël suggested, there's some cause for concern in that it requires
developing a new variant of the general API. This means everything is
slower, including more need for sanity and integration testing than other
projects may entail.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Scikit-learn-general mailing list
Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
