StackOverflow has introduced its Documentation space, where scikit-learn is a covered subject: http://stackoverflow.com/documentation/scikit-learn. The project is a little interesting, and otherwise somewhat exasperating/tiring, given the overlap with our own documentation efforts, which we would like to see continually improve and maintain alignment with the codebase.
Currently there seem to be two contributors. One <http://stackoverflow.com/users/3580365/gal-dreiman> appears to have been copy-pasting official scikit-learn documentation, while the other <http://stackoverflow.com/users/3510736/ami-tavory> has produced original material. From a license perspective, copy-pasted material might be okay with attribution and reference to a BSD licence, with the assumption that it is then double-licensed (BSD and CC-BY-SA) if copied from SO. But I assume that copying without attribution is actually plagiarism and should be reverted, while we should discourage copying with attribution: if SO Documentation for scikit-learn has its place, it should be different to the official reference...?
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
