Hm, that’s an “interesting” approach by SO, I guess their idea is to build a 
collection of code-and-example based snippets for less well-documented 
libraries — especially, libraries that want to keep their documentation lean. 

> But I assume that copying without attribution is actually plagiarism and 
> should be reverted, 


as far as I know, you are right regarding BSD.

In this scikit-learn case, it seems more like that these users are merely 
“farming” for SO points and rep by reposting scikit-learn documentation. In my 
opinion, the polite way to go about it is to just comment as a scikit-learn dev 
saying that these reposts are okay under the BSD license but that a 
contribution to the original source needs to be added since it violates the 
copyright otherwise — like you mentioned — and adding a nice message 
encouraging these users to make suggestions and improvements to the original 
docs. (and if nothing changes after xx days, I would report it to SO).


> On Aug 4, 2016, at 12:25 AM, Joel Nothman <joel.noth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> StackOverflow has introduced its Documentation space, where scikit-learn is a 
> covered subject: http://stackoverflow.com/documentation/scikit-learn. The 
> project is a little interesting, and otherwise somewhat exasperating/tiring, 
> given the overlap with our own documentation efforts, which we would like to 
> see continually improve and maintain alignment with the codebase.
> 
> Currently there seem to be two contributors. One appears to have been 
> copy-pasting official scikit-learn documentation, while the other has 
> produced original material. From a license perspective, copy-pasted material 
> might be okay with attribution and reference to a BSD licence, with the 
> assumption that it is then double-licensed (BSD and CC-BY-SA) if copied from 
> SO.
> 
> But I assume that copying without attribution is actually plagiarism and 
> should be reverted, while we should discourage copying with attribution: if 
> SO Documentation for scikit-learn has its place, it should be different to 
> the official reference...?
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

Reply via email to