I have a question which may/may not be relevant here. The question is why don't we assign issues to the one who have asked to take this issue. This feature may give us a better picture of the current stat of the Issue. We can ping that person directly and get info regarding his progress in case of a long haul of inactivity.
Regards Siddharth Gupta, Ph: 9871012292 Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sidgupta234/> | Github <https://github.com/sidgupta234> | Codechef <https://www.codechef.com/users/sidgupta234> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/SidGupta234> | Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1483695876> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Joel Nothman <joel.noth...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've put a column for that status in. > > Note: this has largely been generated with https://gist.github.com/ > jnothman/8eba0834acfd633c6d83b437f6f18c49 > > On 30 September 2016 at 00:16, Guillaume Lemaître <g.lemaitr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> What do you think about splitting MRG and MRG+1 in two different column. >> The scrolling can get a little bit less annoying and you can have an >> easier view on the MRG+1 to kick them out. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> scikit-learn mailing list >> scikit-learn@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > >
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
