On 21 September 2016 at 22:13, Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 09/19/2016 09:56 PM, Nelle Varoquaux wrote: >>> >>> Another bot-able tool might be pinging inactive PRs to ask if they're >>> being >>> worked on, and labelling "Needs contributor" if there's no reply within n >>> days...! > > That kind of only works when the status is "waiting for changes", > and not "waiting for reviews". I guess we could tag all old issues > or use the new interface (though you said that's not scriptable yet?) > So we would need to actually use the "needs reviews" tag and add an > "waiting for changes" tag. And I guess the "waiting for changes" should be > removed automatically when the author changed something and changed to > "needs review"? > > Is there an API to access the "fixes #ISSUE" thing for auto-closing? Just > mentioning an issue > doesn't mean it's a PR to solve the issue. > >> If PRs are inactive, it might also be interesting to tag them as >> easy_fix when there is little to do. >> >> > That's much harder to automate though. > I know that I often misjudge the amount that is left to do in a PR, > not sure if bots are better at that than humans yet.
Bots wouldn't be able to do that, but I find that an hour now and then scrolling throught old PR works pretty well :) > > Are there bots with LSTM support yet? ;) > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn _______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
