Thank you for the answer.
I also thought about ShuffleSplit (n_splits=1), but I need to control which
indices are used for training and which for testing in the nested folds. The
problem is that I did feature selection before hyperparameters optimization
(with a nested Leave One Out schema) and now I need the same partitioning for
hyperparameters optimization. The reason why I did this is that the feature
selection step is incredibly slow, I hope I can get rid of that step in the
permutation test. Is not clear to me if I have to include feature selection in
the permutation test as well.
Maybe LeavePOut is what I need.
Best
Ludovico
________________________________
Da: scikit-learn <scikit-learn-bounces+ludo25_90=hotmail....@python.org> per
conto di scikit-learn-requ...@python.org <scikit-learn-requ...@python.org>
Inviato: mercoledì 7 dicembre 2016 17.48
A: scikit-learn@python.org
Oggetto: scikit-learn Digest, Vol 9, Issue 22
Send scikit-learn mailing list submissions to
scikit-learn@python.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
scikit-learn Info Page -
Python<https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn>
mail.python.org
To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the scikit-learn
Archives. Using scikit-learn: To post a message to all the list members ...
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
scikit-learn-requ...@python.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
scikit-learn-ow...@python.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of scikit-learn digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: New to scikit (Andreas Mueller)
2. Re: Nested Leave One Subject Out (LOSO) cross validation with
scikit (Andreas Mueller)
3. return type of StandardScaler (Nilay Shrivastava)
4. Re: return type of StandardScaler (Bharat Didwania .)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:33:38 -0500
From: Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com>
To: Scikit-learn user and developer mailing list
<scikit-learn@python.org>
Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] New to scikit
Message-ID: <f1d5d579-0646-d05d-4bde-9d44c34ec...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"
http://scikit-learn.org/dev/developers/contributing.html#deprecation
On 12/07/2016 09:42 AM, Chinmay Talegaonkar wrote:
> Yeah, I found an easy bug. Looking for some help in writing
> deprecation cycles for a bug.
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Siddharth Gupta
> <siddharthgupta...@gmail.com <mailto:siddharthgupta...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Great! Welcome to the community. I would suggest you to check out
> the issues page on the github repo, raise hand to the issues you
> feel like you can give a go to, check out the issues that are
> tagged as require contributor. Issues are a good way to start,
> they will direct you about the areas of the code base to explore.
>
> On Dec 7, 2016 6:02 PM, "Chinmay Talegaonkar"
> <chinmay0...@gmail.com <mailto:chinmay0...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> I have a prior experience in python, and
> have started learning machine learning recently. I wanted to
> contribute to scikit, can anyone suggest a relatively easy
> codebase to explore.
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn@python.org <mailto:scikit-learn@python.org>
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
> <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn@python.org <mailto:scikit-learn@python.org>
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
> <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn>
>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> *Chinmay Talegaonkar*
> Cultural and Events Coordinator, Mood Indigo
> ..............................................
>
>
> +91-8879178724
> chinmay0...@gmail.com <mailto:bajajkshiti...@gmail.com>
> www.moodi.org<http://www.moodi.org> <http://www.moodi.org/>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-learn/attachments/20161207/4f86464e/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:33:00 -0500
From: Andreas Mueller <t3k...@gmail.com>
To: Scikit-learn user and developer mailing list
<scikit-learn@python.org>
Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] Nested Leave One Subject Out (LOSO) cross
validation with scikit
Message-ID: <e9e342f5-d09b-92b7-e304-a0bfa37ae...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"
On 12/07/2016 07:41 AM, Ludovico Coletta wrote:
>
> Dear scikit experts,
>
>
> I did as you suggested, but it is not exactly what I would like to do
> ( I also read this:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40400351/nested-cross-validation-with-stratifiedshufflesplit-in-sklearn)
>
> Perhaps I should ask my question in another way: it is possible to
> split the nested cv folds just once? It seems to me that this is not
> possible, do you have any hints?
>
>
Not sure I understand your question.
You can do a single split by using ShuffleSplit(n_splits=1) for example.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-learn/attachments/20161207/063e6a44/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 22:14:18 +0530
From: Nilay Shrivastava <nilay.eule...@gmail.com>
To: scikit-learn@python.org
Subject: [scikit-learn] return type of StandardScaler
Message-ID:
<caklfaqra_qgdyprddtg58nhybqurwbct2_2nzkzriomww5r...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
StandardScaler returns numpy array even if the object passed is a pandas
dataframe, shouldn't it return a dataframe?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-learn/attachments/20161207/feecd6be/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:48:47 -0800
From: "Bharat Didwania ." <bharat.didwania.ee...@itbhu.ac.in>
To: Scikit-learn user and developer mailing list
<scikit-learn@python.org>
Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] return type of StandardScaler
Message-ID:
<caa3g_m_jqwalgkqa530vp5pshdry+mcwqiuts5qhdv-ejtc...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
you can use pandas.get_dummies()
<http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/generated/pandas.get_dummies.html>.
It will perform one hot encoding on categorical columns, and produce a
dataframe as the result. From there you can use pandas.concat([existing_df,
new_df],axis=0) to add the new columns to your existing dataframe. This
will avoid the use of a numpy array.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Nilay Shrivastava <nilay.eule...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> StandardScaler returns numpy array even if the object passed is a pandas
> dataframe, shouldn't it return a dataframe?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-learn/attachments/20161207/d6afb4d5/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
------------------------------
End of scikit-learn Digest, Vol 9, Issue 22
*******************************************
_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
