And yet GitHub just rolled out a new "reviewers" field for assigning these things...
On 7 December 2016 at 03:26, Raghav R V <rag...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for self assigning PRs by reviewers... > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Andy <t3k...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for your thoughts. >> I'm working in a similar mode, though I kind of try to avoid too much >> last-in first-out - I do it too, though, >> because I'm trying to keep up with all notifications. >> However, there are many older PRs and issues that are important bug-fixes >> and they get lost because of some minor new feature being added. >> Your point about faster communication in recent issues is taken, though. >> >> But I feel we should prioritize bug fixes much more - they do need more >> brain power to review, though :-/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> scikit-learn mailing list >> scikit-learn@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >> > > > > -- > Raghav RV > https://github.com/raghavrv > > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > >
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
