Oh okay. But that shouldn’t be a problem, the RandomForestRegressor also 
supports multi-outpout regression; same expected target array shape: 
[n_samples, n_outputs]

Best,
Sebastian

> On Jan 21, 2017, at 1:27 PM, Carlton Banks <nofl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Not classifiication…  but regression.. 
> and yes both the input and output should be stored stored like that.. 
> 
>> Den 21. jan. 2017 kl. 19.24 skrev Sebastian Raschka <se.rasc...@gmail.com>:
>> 
>> Hi, Carlton,
>> sounds like you are looking for multilabel classification and your target 
>> array has the shape [n_samples, n_outputs]? If the output shape is 
>> consistent (aka all output label arrays have 13 columns), you should be 
>> fine, otherwise, you could use the MultiLabelBinarizer 
>> (http://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.MultiLabelBinarizer.html#sklearn.preprocessing.MultiLabelBinarizer).
>> 
>> Also, the RandomForestClassifier should support multillabel classification.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Sebastian
>> 
>>> On Jan 21, 2017, at 12:59 PM, Carlton Banks <nofl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Most of the machine learning library i’ve tried has an option of of just 
>>> give the dimension…
>>> In this case my input consist of an numpy.ndarray with shape (x,2050) and 
>>> the output is an numpy.ndarray with shape (x,13) 
>>> x is different for each  set… 
>>> But for each set is the number of columns consistent.  
>>> 
>>> Column consistency is usually enough for most library tools i’ve worked 
>>> with… 
>>> But is this not the case here?
>>>> Den 21. jan. 2017 kl. 18.42 skrev Jacob Schreiber 
>>>> <jmschreibe...@gmail.com>:
>>>> 
>>>> I don't understand what you mean. Does each sample have a fixed number of 
>>>> features or not?
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Carlton Banks <nofl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Thanks for the response!
>>>> 
>>>> If you see it in 1d then yes…. it has variable length. In 2d will the 
>>>> number of columns always be constant both for the input and output. 
>>>> 
>>>>> Den 21. jan. 2017 kl. 18.25 skrev Jacob Schreiber 
>>>>> <jmschreibe...@gmail.com>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> If what you're saying is that you have a variable length input, then most 
>>>>> sklearn classifiers won't work on this data. They expect a fixed feature 
>>>>> set. Perhaps you could try extracting a set of informative features being 
>>>>> fed into the classifier?
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Carlton Banks <nofl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi guys..
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am currently working on a ASR project  in which the objective is to 
>>>>> substitute part of the general ASR framework with some form of neural 
>>>>> network, to see whether the tested part improves in any way.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I started working with the feature extraction and tried, to make a neural 
>>>>> network (NN) that could create MFCC features. I already know what the 
>>>>> desired output is supposed to be, so the problem boils down to a simple
>>>>> input -  output mapping. Problem here is the my NN doesn’t seem to 
>>>>> perform that well..  and i seem to get pretty large error for some reason.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I therefore wanted to give random forrest a try, and see whether it could 
>>>>> provide me a better result.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am currently storing my input and output in numpy.ndarrays, in which 
>>>>> the input and output columns is consistent throughout all the examples, 
>>>>> but the number of rows changes
>>>>> depending on length of the audio file.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is it possible with the random forrest implementation in scikit-learn to 
>>>>> train a random forrest to map an input an output, given they are stored 
>>>>> numpy.ndarrays?
>>>>> Or do i have do it in a different way? and if so how?
>>>>> 
>>>>> kind regards
>>>>> 
>>>>> Carl truz
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>>>> scikit-learn@python.org
>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>>>> scikit-learn@python.org
>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>>> scikit-learn@python.org
>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>>> scikit-learn@python.org
>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>> scikit-learn@python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> scikit-learn mailing list
>> scikit-learn@python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
> 
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

Reply via email to