Thanks for the Info!.. 
How do you set it up.. 

There doesn’t seem a example available for regression purposes.. 
> Den 21. jan. 2017 kl. 19.32 skrev Sebastian Raschka <se.rasc...@gmail.com>:
> 
> Oh okay. But that shouldn’t be a problem, the RandomForestRegressor also 
> supports multi-outpout regression; same expected target array shape: 
> [n_samples, n_outputs]
> 
> Best,
> Sebastian
> 
>> On Jan 21, 2017, at 1:27 PM, Carlton Banks <nofl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Not classifiication…  but regression.. 
>> and yes both the input and output should be stored stored like that.. 
>> 
>>> Den 21. jan. 2017 kl. 19.24 skrev Sebastian Raschka <se.rasc...@gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>> Hi, Carlton,
>>> sounds like you are looking for multilabel classification and your target 
>>> array has the shape [n_samples, n_outputs]? If the output shape is 
>>> consistent (aka all output label arrays have 13 columns), you should be 
>>> fine, otherwise, you could use the MultiLabelBinarizer 
>>> (http://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.MultiLabelBinarizer.html#sklearn.preprocessing.MultiLabelBinarizer).
>>> 
>>> Also, the RandomForestClassifier should support multillabel classification.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Sebastian
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 21, 2017, at 12:59 PM, Carlton Banks <nofl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Most of the machine learning library i’ve tried has an option of of just 
>>>> give the dimension…
>>>> In this case my input consist of an numpy.ndarray with shape (x,2050) and 
>>>> the output is an numpy.ndarray with shape (x,13) 
>>>> x is different for each  set… 
>>>> But for each set is the number of columns consistent.  
>>>> 
>>>> Column consistency is usually enough for most library tools i’ve worked 
>>>> with… 
>>>> But is this not the case here?
>>>>> Den 21. jan. 2017 kl. 18.42 skrev Jacob Schreiber 
>>>>> <jmschreibe...@gmail.com>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't understand what you mean. Does each sample have a fixed number of 
>>>>> features or not?
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Carlton Banks <nofl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Thanks for the response!
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you see it in 1d then yes…. it has variable length. In 2d will the 
>>>>> number of columns always be constant both for the input and output. 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Den 21. jan. 2017 kl. 18.25 skrev Jacob Schreiber 
>>>>>> <jmschreibe...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If what you're saying is that you have a variable length input, then 
>>>>>> most sklearn classifiers won't work on this data. They expect a fixed 
>>>>>> feature set. Perhaps you could try extracting a set of informative 
>>>>>> features being fed into the classifier?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Carlton Banks <nofl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi guys..
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am currently working on a ASR project  in which the objective is to 
>>>>>> substitute part of the general ASR framework with some form of neural 
>>>>>> network, to see whether the tested part improves in any way.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I started working with the feature extraction and tried, to make a 
>>>>>> neural network (NN) that could create MFCC features. I already know what 
>>>>>> the desired output is supposed to be, so the problem boils down to a 
>>>>>> simple
>>>>>> input -  output mapping. Problem here is the my NN doesn’t seem to 
>>>>>> perform that well..  and i seem to get pretty large error for some 
>>>>>> reason.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I therefore wanted to give random forrest a try, and see whether it 
>>>>>> could provide me a better result.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am currently storing my input and output in numpy.ndarrays, in which 
>>>>>> the input and output columns is consistent throughout all the examples, 
>>>>>> but the number of rows changes
>>>>>> depending on length of the audio file.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is it possible with the random forrest implementation in scikit-learn to 
>>>>>> train a random forrest to map an input an output, given they are stored 
>>>>>> numpy.ndarrays?
>>>>>> Or do i have do it in a different way? and if so how?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Carl truz
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>>>>> scikit-learn@python.org
>>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>>>>> scikit-learn@python.org
>>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>>>> scikit-learn@python.org
>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>>>> scikit-learn@python.org
>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>>> scikit-learn@python.org
>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> scikit-learn mailing list
>>> scikit-learn@python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> scikit-learn mailing list
>> scikit-learn@python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
> 
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

_______________________________________________
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn

Reply via email to