Thanks folks! That gives us a good start I think! Re documentation: honestly I'm not entirely sure if those are good issues because I'm not sure if we have consensus what we want to recommend. We can certainly include these but they require some decisions and a lot of expertise. Maybe we can discuss further issues either here or on gitter?
Andy On Fri, May 29, 2020, 09:45 Thomas J Fan <thomasjp...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can commit to reviewing. Diving into their program, it looks like they > are hiring supervisers through: https://raise.dev/Apply/?ref=mlh which is > titled "Software Developer Coach". By looking at their > https://fellowship.mlh.io/students they have about 9 weeks of actual > contributing. > > Given they have an engineer to help, maybe they can work on the > documenting the production aspects: > > 1. Roadmap item 19: Documentation and tooling for model lifecycle > management > 2. Roadmap item 21: Document good practices to detect temporal distrubiton > drift > > Regards, > Thomas > > On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 5:36 PM, Andreas C. Mueller < > andreasmuelle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Folks. > > So this program sounds pretty cool. They preselected some people for an ML > work group, who will be doing daily standups together and pair programming, > and who might move around between some related projects over the 12 weeks > of the program. > > They made sure to get a diverse set of students and they have an engineer > that will supervised them. > > They would probably have 2-3 students working on sklearn. > > They don’t expect having one big feature but they do expect some guidance > on what issues to work on. > > Also, the program starts on Monday, and they start contributing to OSS > projects about a week after that. > > Ideally we’d tell them if we’re in or not before Monday, and have a > tentative list of issues / projects. > > > > What do you all think? Also, if we want to do it, who would have cycles > for some reviewing? > > This seems to be well organized and they seem to have put quite some > thought into it, but we do need to do a little bit of work on our end. > > I can try picking some issues but I probably can’t commit a lot of > reviewing time. > > > > Cheers, > > Andy > > > > > > *From:* scikit-learn <scikit-learn-bounces+t3kcit=gmail....@python.org> *On > Behalf Of *Adrin > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 19, 2020 3:42 PM > *To:* Scikit-learn mailing list <scikit-learn@python.org> > *Subject:* Re: [scikit-learn] major league hacking summer internship > program > > > > Sounds pretty cool to me. > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 6:45 PM <t3k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey Folks. > > This program reached out to me: > > > https://news.mlh.io/mlh-fellowship-the-future-of-tech-internships-05-04-2020 > > > > What do you think? > > Sounds like GSOC but with extra mentorship, so it might be a good fit for > us? > > I would say it depends on what level of involvement they require from us. > > > > Best, > > Andy > > > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-learn mailing list > scikit-learn@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn >
_______________________________________________ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
