Armel Asselin:

> I realize that one other way would be to have a "StoreExternalAction(ID)"
> when undo/redo would be called on it, Scintilla would do nothing but send a
> SC_EXTERNAL_ACTION notification with the ID and the right
> SC_PERFORMED_???.On this notification, my component would do its job?

   Allowing the container to be in control seems more scalable. Think
about a merge application (like WinMerge) where there are two
Scintilla windows and modifications can be copied from either side to
the other.

   Neil

_______________________________________________
Scintilla-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scintilla-interest

Reply via email to