Philippe Lhoste: > Or those (coming from Access world?) liking strange field names with > spaces or other exotic characters in them. I suppose that's why there > are those backticks.
Microsoft tools often allow names to be surrounded by '[' and ']' in a similar way to the backticks. > That's the old code. > Neil, is my lexer in purgatory (yet to be commited) or in hell (will > never be integrated, unless some massive changes are done)? You hadn't published until now: on September 29 there was a mail mentioning a new version but the code wasn't included. The version above seems not to be based on that as it still supports indentation based folding and the message said that had been removed. I have committed this version but with the loop variable 'j' declared one line earlier to work with modern compilers. > Minor point, worth being mentionned to those wanting to apply the patch > and use it with SciTE: > In SciTEProps.cxx, propertiesToForward array must have > "sql.backticks.identifier", > added so Scintilla sees this property. This is now "lexer.sql.backticks.identifier". Committed to CVS and available from http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/scite.zip Source http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/wscite.zip Windows executable Neil _______________________________________________ Scintilla-interest mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scintilla-interest
