--- April White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bruce Dodson wrote: > > >The question will be, which way is the least > surprising: having > >savebefore:yes sometimes not save, or having your > document saved even when > >you can't save? For me, I don't think it will make > a difference either way. > >For some, it's clear that it does make a > difference. But, I'm pretty sure > >it doesn't warrant a fourth option. The difference > is so subtle that > >another option would be hard to describe, and would > just add confusion. We > >should just decide what makes the most sense, make > it work that way, and > >document it. > > > Bruce, the code to detect "savebefore:auto" is > trivial because of the > use of that keyword for replaceselection. Having > this command mode be > documented that "savebefore:yes" always saves, > "savebefore:no" never > saves, and "savebefore:auto only saves when the > buffer is changed should > be sufficient. > > Your thoughts? Jos? > > April >
April, I would prefer this option, since that won't change the current behaviour for people that expect the file always to save, and gives me (and others) the option i would like to have. Thanks, Jos :) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Scite-interest mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scite-interest
