> Why would you want both a BOM and a cookie? They achieve the same > objective in different ways.
I didn't know Scite uses a non-standard way to mark utf8 encoded files. Why not use a BOM instead? There is use for a cookie as it breaks with unicode standards while the BOM solves just that. "Where a BOM is used with UTF-8, it is only used as an ecoding signature to distinguish UTF-8 from other encodings — it has nothing to do with byte order." > This code assumes (depending on settings) that anything that can be > validly interpreted as UTF-8 is UTF-8. Not an assumption that I think is > safe. Unfort. yes. _______________________________________________ Scite-interest mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scite-interest
