Neil Hodgson wrote:
Robert Roessler wrote:
For me on VS 2003 and using "smallest code" settings, SciTE.exe and
SciLexer.dll come in at a trim 269KB and 329KB respectively. :)
There's a trade-off between efficiency and the hassles caused by
dependencies and I mostly favour problem avoidance.
That wasn't an either-or... my stated sizes are *for* the static
[runtime included] builds of SciTE.exe and SciLexer.dll (the "smallest
code" bit is just compiler stuff, not use-runtime-dll stuff).
For VS 2003 (using the .mak files) SciTE.exe is around 450K and
SciLexer.dll is 330K. Why is your SciTE.exe so small? Does Lua work?
I had always wondered why my exe was so much smaller... apparently, a
couple of years ago I had stuffed NO_LUA into the project settings -
the correct [full] size for my build of SciTE.exe is 456KB. :)
Humorously, line 717 in liolib.c yields an "unreachable code" warning
- the humor, of course, is that said line is
return 0; /* to avoid warnings */
which is obviously talking about a different warning, but still... :)
Robert Roessler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rftp.com
_______________________________________________
Scite-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.lyra.org/mailman/listinfo/scite-interest
