They've got links to a lot of articles on the entire Gong Show.

http://www.thelinuxshow.com/

On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 19:52, Michael Morey wrote:
> Hello ,
> 
>   I saw this article in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal and thought I'd
>   pass it along.
> 
>   SCO Announces Plans to Seek Licensing Fees from Linux Users
>       by David Bank
> 
>       SCO Group Inc., which claim copyright ownership over parts of
>       the Linux operating system, announced plans to seek licensing
>       fees potentially totaling billions of dollars from users of the
>       popular "open source" software.
> 
>       By instituting the licensing program, SCO acknowledged that it
>       is seeking to bolster its sagging sales by wringing revenue out
>       of its rights to Unix, an older operating system from which
>       Linux was derived. SCO said it is able to pursue
>       copyright-infringement charges after receiving registrations for
>       its copyrights from the U.S. Copyright Office. Such
>       registrations are considered a minor procedural matter.
> 
>       In March, the Lindon, Utah, company sued International Business
>       Machines Corp., alleging IBM transferred trade secrets to Linux
>       and violating a contract associated with a joint-development
>       project. IBM is among the biggest boosters of Linux, and its
>       support has helped Linux gain momentum among corporate computer
>       users.
> 
>       SCO said it has begun to contact companies using Linux about the
>       licensing program, backed by the possibility of legal action
>       against companies that don't comply. Alternatively, said SCO
>       Chief Executive Darl McBride, Linux users could revert to an
>       earlier version of Linux before certain sophisticated features
>       were included.
> 
>       "Linux is set to grow pretty dramatically," Mr. McBride said in
>       an interview. "Do we all want to move forward together and we
>       get a piece of that? Or do we want to turn the clock back to
>       where it was a few years ago?"
> 
>       Exact pricing for the license hasn't been determined but will
>       roughly correspond to prices for UnixWare. Those fees range from
>       $700 for a single-processor computer server to more than $10,000
>       for more-powerful systems. "Even if you take an average number,
>       it gets to a few billion [dollars] pretty quickly," Mr. McBride
>       said. He said the company would seek consulting-service
>       contracts from such customers as well. Those prospects helped
>       boost SCO's share price 11% to $13.32 in 4 p.m. Nasdaq Stock
>       Market trading.
> 
>       "Open source" refers to the ability of programmers to modify the
>       programming instructions, known as source code, that are used to
>       create software. SCO, which suspended shipments of its own
>       version of Linux after filing the IBM suit, has lately become
>       the target of considerable vitriol by Linux developers for
>       threatening the movement.
> 
>       A spokeswoman for IBM said SCO hadn't yet shown the company any
>       source code that infringed its copyrights. "SCO seems to be
>       asking customers to pay for a license based on allegations, not
>       facts," said the spokeswoman, Trink Guarino.
> 
>       Similarly, Leigh Day, a spokeswoman for Red Hat Inc., one of the
>       largest distributors of Linux, said SCO's move "is designed to
>       frighten customers into purchasing licenses that we feel are
>       unnecessary." SCO hasn't named Red Hat in any litigation. "We
>       feel completely confident that what we're offering to customers
>       is not in violation of valid intellectual property rights," Ms.
>       Day said.
> 
>       Both Microsoft Corp. and Sun Microsystems Inc. have recently
>       licensed SCO's software, effectively putting the bitter rivals
>       on the same side of some of the issues surrounding Linux.
> 
> Best regards,
> Michael Morey
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> GOD BLESS THE USA!
> 
> * * * * * * * ============
> * * * * * * * ============
> * * * * * * * ============
> * * * * * * * ============
> ==========================
> ==========================
> ==========================
> ==========================
> 

Reply via email to