Seek and thou shalt NOT receive.

SCO must prove they own any code in the Linux kernel.  Hey it shouldn't be that hard 
to do since the source is freely available.

What we're seeing from SCO is the same behavior that a child would exhibit.   SCO is 
banking that somebody settles out of court or simply purchases them.   All this in a 
weak attempt to gain value for the shareholders and the executives.   Who knows, maybe 
Microsoft is encouraging this behavior.

But what can you expect from a company that is taking on water faster than it will 
evaporate.  They've got nothing useful to sell so they look for other "income" 
opportunities.



---------- Original Message -------------
Subject: [sclug-general] SCO Linux Alert
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 19:52:16 -0500
From: Michael Morey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Afterlife <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        George Penn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        SCLug - Generallist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        Shane Steckelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Hello ,

  I saw this article in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal and thought I'd
  pass it along.

  SCO Announces Plans to Seek Licensing Fees from Linux Users
      by David Bank

      SCO Group Inc., which claim copyright ownership over parts of
      the Linux operating system, announced plans to seek licensing
      fees potentially totaling billions of dollars from users of the
      popular "open source" software.

      By instituting the licensing program, SCO acknowledged that it
      is seeking to bolster its sagging sales by wringing revenue out
      of its rights to Unix, an older operating system from which
      Linux was derived. SCO said it is able to pursue
      copyright-infringement charges after receiving registrations for
      its copyrights from the U.S. Copyright Office. Such
      registrations are considered a minor procedural matter.

      In March, the Lindon, Utah, company sued International Business
      Machines Corp., alleging IBM transferred trade secrets to Linux
      and violating a contract associated with a joint-development
      project. IBM is among the biggest boosters of Linux, and its
      support has helped Linux gain momentum among corporate computer
      users.

      SCO said it has begun to contact companies using Linux about the
      licensing program, backed by the possibility of legal action
      against companies that don't comply. Alternatively, said SCO
      Chief Executive Darl McBride, Linux users could revert to an
      earlier version of Linux before certain sophisticated features
      were included.

      "Linux is set to grow pretty dramatically," Mr. McBride said in
      an interview. "Do we all want to move forward together and we
      get a piece of that? Or do we want to turn the clock back to
      where it was a few years ago?"

      Exact pricing for the license hasn't been determined but will
      roughly correspond to prices for UnixWare. Those fees range from
      $700 for a single-processor computer server to more than $10,000
      for more-powerful systems. "Even if you take an average number,
      it gets to a few billion [dollars] pretty quickly," Mr. McBride
      said. He said the company would seek consulting-service
      contracts from such customers as well. Those prospects helped
      boost SCO's share price 11% to $13.32 in 4 p.m. Nasdaq Stock
      Market trading.

      "Open source" refers to the ability of programmers to modify the
      programming instructions, known as source code, that are used to
      create software. SCO, which suspended shipments of its own
      version of Linux after filing the IBM suit, has lately become
      the target of considerable vitriol by Linux developers for
      threatening the movement.

      A spokeswoman for IBM said SCO hadn't yet shown the company any
      source code that infringed its copyrights. "SCO seems to be
      asking customers to pay for a license based on allegations, not
      facts," said the spokeswoman, Trink Guarino.

      Similarly, Leigh Day, a spokeswoman for Red Hat Inc., one of the
      largest distributors of Linux, said SCO's move "is designed to
      frighten customers into purchasing licenses that we feel are
      unnecessary." SCO hasn't named Red Hat in any litigation. "We
      feel completely confident that what we're offering to customers
      is not in violation of valid intellectual property rights," Ms.
      Day said.

      Both Microsoft Corp. and Sun Microsystems Inc. have recently
      licensed SCO's software, effectively putting the bitter rivals
      on the same side of some of the issues surrounding Linux.

Best regards,
Michael Morey
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GOD BLESS THE USA!

* * * * * * * ============
* * * * * * * ============
* * * * * * * ============
* * * * * * * ============
==========================
==========================
==========================
==========================

-- 
Jeff

Reply via email to