2005/11/18, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


Wim Deblauwe a écrit :
> So, summarizing:
>
> 1) we need a lock/edit command in the ScmProvider interface, since the
> release plugin knows that interface. We then have 2 options: define a
> special property or let the release plugin call lock/edit always and
> provide an empty implementation in AbstractScmProvider for the
> non-clearcase SCM's. For me option 2, seems nicest.

We need these 2 options. Default implementation will do nothing for providers that don't have a
specific implementation. The special property will be useful for some provider like cvs. In cvs, we
can have 2 modes (with or without lock/edit), so we'll implement the lock/edit command in cvs and
users can activate or not it with the special property. Release plugin can't always call lock/edit
command, it will depend on users configuration.

ok, so I'll go ahead and add 2 methods (edit and unedit) to the ScmProvider interface. But how should I implement them in AbstractScmProvider currently? Leave them empty or throw exception?
 

>
> 2) checkout is currently incorrectly implemented. It currently calls
> 'cleartool co', but it should not do that. It should create a view
> dynamically (not impossible), but then? Should it copy the contents to
> some file location? But then you won't be able to do any clearcase
> operations on that.

You're our clearcase specialist (With Dan), so implement it like you think it's better. Personnaly,
i think it isn't a good idea to copy contents to an other location if we can't do other operations
of them

Is this needed by continuum only? Or what tools/plugins might need this also? Isn't it possible to just point to a local file in continuum and tell continuum to build that on the location it is. Because for clearcase, a lot of parameters are needed and it will not be that easy.
The most important for me right now is getting the release plugin to work, so I would like to change the current checkout implementation to throw an exception for clearcase (in stead of doing the wrong thing as it does currently).

regards,

Wim
 

Emmanuel


Reply via email to