Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes: > "Mark J. Nelson" <Mark.J.Nelson at Sun.COM> writes: > >> I spent a little more time last night moving items around on the code >> review feedback wiki. >> >> I believe the answer is: >> >> 1. My findunref wad, regardless of the strategy chosen for clobber turds >> >> 2. Bill's wx2hg wad >> >> 3. We need to at least triage the correctness-related items on the wiki >> >> ...is that true? Are we definitely waiting for (2)? Does anybody think >> that we need both the code AND exception lists stabilized for findunref? >> >> Has anybody looked at the findunref wad? >> >> Is anybody else looking at triage? >> >> I want this out this week, which leaves me pretty busy today/tomorrow, but >> depending on 1-3 above, I'm comfortable with. > > I'd like #510 as ammended in there.
Oops, I had more to say there. It would be good to have Bill's wad, as it deals with #462. I've looked briefly at your findunref wad, and nothing stood out, but I don't feel fit to review it (I can't make use of findunref in its natural habitat, and the other things that spring to mind you and I have already discussed). I don't think anything really stands out as needing to be done before review starts necessarily, but there are further things we need to fix before integration, though I don't feel they're particularly invasive. -- Rich
