> It would be good to have Bill's wad, as it deals with #462. OK, I'm not sure when he projects availability, last I saw was "hang on, I'm rewhacking it."
> I've looked briefly at your findunref wad, and nothing stood out, but > I don't feel fit to review it (I can't make use of findunref in its > natural habitat, and the other things that spring to mind you and I > have already discussed). Actually, as of my changes, you SHOULD be able to use it quite naturally. You won't get the closed files, but the nightly.sh invocation should be identical, with the contents of the generated exception_list being different depending on $(CLOSED_IS_PRESENT). But that's beside the point: I'm OK with the testing internally. > I don't think anything really stands out as needing to be done before > review starts necessarily, but there are further things we need to fix > before integration, though I don't feel they're particularly invasive. Sounds like we're on the same page, I hope we can all three get our wads done today/tomorrow. Off to review yours... --Mark
