>From Bill's link in IRC: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sommerfe/onnv-scm.8/index.html
194-202: It's not clear to me why you're doing wx outchk AND wx out here. It seems like just wx out would be sufficient, as long as you actually output the results in the waring message. (Doesn't outchk only warn about files that aren't under wx supervision, and so couldn't you get a failure with no file output, if it's in the active list but checked out?) 301: I think this message should at least refer to $codemgr_parent instead of $tw_clone, and even better, be more clear. In your manpage updates, you made this clear, and at least before the hg transition, I'm not sure that the "tw behind the hg clone" is a valid assumption. --Mark
