I didn't go back to the feedback page and look for stuff that wasn't 
included, so this is only a review of the changes that you made.

webrev.sh:1782
- Why fail here if we can't find which_scm?  Couldn't we augment the test
   on 1877-1894 to handle this correctly, and allow success in the case
   where an active list, workspace path, and parent workspace
   path were all specified?

hdrchk(1):
- Under "Additional standards for system header files," bullet item 1
   appears to be missing some text describing the form to use when a system
   file header file is installed in a subdirectory.

--Mark



On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Richard Lowe wrote:

> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:05:23 -0400
> From: Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net>
> To: scm-migration-dev at opensolaris.org
> Subject: [scm-migration-dev] Please review #538/#539
> 
>
> Please review:
>
> 538 webrev(1) and hdrchk(1) nits
> 539 webrev code review nits
>
> Webrev:                 http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richlowe/scm_wrnits
> PDF copies of manpages: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richlowe/scm_wrnits/pdf/
> Sample webrev:          http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richlowe/scm_wrnits/sample/
>
> The sample webrev is largely useful to get an idea of the orange
> colour used for the mode warnings ("orange" isn't particularly visible
> against the background).
>
> You'll notice that comments_from_mercurial was removed.  This is
> because we never actually use it, we always get our comments from a
> wx-format file list, and as such $wxfile is always set, and we always
> go directly through comments_from_wx, as such I removed it.
>
> You'll notice in webrev(1) that a number of .IR references became .BR,
> This is to match the other manpages we have, and is generally the
> right thing as best as I understand it.  (webrev used to be this way
> too, I think I must have erroneously changed it).
>
> The specific code review comments involved are noted in the two bugs,
> they are not the full set against each file, but are large subsets
> thereof.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Rich
> _______________________________________________
> scm-migration-dev mailing list
> scm-migration-dev at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/scm-migration-dev
>

Reply via email to