usr/src/lib/libslp/javalib/com/sun/slp/SLPTemplateRegistry.java - Why did you update this copyright?
Should JStyle.py check for @version and warn? I assumed that our keywords checks would catch any remaining SCCS keywords, if you had missed any. --Mark On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Richard Lowe wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:29:34 -0400 > From: Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> > To: scm-migration-dev at opensolaris.org > Subject: [scm-migration-dev] Please review 4758439 > > > Please review: > > 4758439 some files use "current date" sccs keywords > > Webrev: > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~richlowe/onnv_4758439 > > Again, these changes are largely incidental to output, so I haven't > bumped the copyright. The only result on output from the Java files > would be if javadoc were generated. I noticed, after doing much of > this, that we don't deliver javadoc for these things. But after > having done most of it... > > wbem was updated as far as @version as it seemed worth doing in tandem > with slp, it doesn't actually use the current date keywords. > > The changes made to packaging were to remove the PSTAMP specification, > as the vast majority of ON packages do not specify it, but allow it to > default. And duplicating the version information in PSTAMP has no > real purpose. > > wsdiff comparison of these is unfortunately not useful, as line > numbers change, and .class files appear to be line-number sensitive > (or so my quick experimentation suggests). > > Advice on testing the java bits appreciated, on the assumption that > by-hand verification that I changed nothing but comments is not > acceptable alone. > > I have built SUNWmibii, SUNWsacom, and SUNWsasnm with these changes, > but have not installed them. > > -- Rich > _______________________________________________ > scm-migration-dev mailing list > scm-migration-dev at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/scm-migration-dev >
