Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer at sun.com> writes: >>>>>> "Rich" == Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes: > >> 836 0.9.5: hg mv -A is losing files > [...] > Mike> I'm wondering whether 836 could break recommit. And more generally, > Mike> I'm wondering what rename scenarios we currently have test cases for. > > Rich> For Hg, for Cdm, for? > > cdm (recommit, specifically).
Not enough for me to be completely happy. I'm intending to put the tests I have up in a workspace on opensolaris.org for Jim Walker (and general consumption), but I'm going to have to clear the history in the process, so I was hoping to do so at a point when the workspace here containing it has no active children. > Rich> I'm currently unsure what #836 would do in terms of recommit. Are > Rich> you meaning reci of a victim ws, or are you thinking reci does > Rich> similar things under the hood? > > Either, though more the former. We trust the history as Hg gives it to us, if it sees the file as removed, so do we. (we can't really go second guessing it...) -- Rich
