>>>>> "Rich" == Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> writes:
Rich> I'm currently unsure what #836 would do in terms of recommit. Are Rich> you meaning reci of a victim ws, or are you thinking reci does Rich> similar things under the hood? Mike> Either, though more the former. Rich> We trust the history as Hg gives it to us, if it sees the file as Rich> removed, so do we. (we can't really go second guessing it...) That makes sense. I just tried a few likely scenarios with renames and content updates, and recommit seemed to do the right thing, despite the confusion on hg's part. So I don't think issue836 is a stopper for us. mike
