>>>>> "Jim" == James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> writes:
Jim> Seriously, if there's a dependency on possibly unstable bits, it'd Jim> be good to think about how to handle that properly. The current approach is for cdm to know what version is Mercurial it works with, and to complain if you've got a different version installed. Rich> The tools aren't interface delivered to users, I think the appropriate Rich> thing would be a contract between the ON C-Team and SFW for the Rich> mercurial internals. Jim> Yes, that'd be a decent way to handle it. Jim> Niftier still if it could one day swim upstream ... Yeah. I hadn't really thought much about that option. What would be involved to turn cdm into a bundled Mercurial extension, like MQ? We'd probably want to pull out the ON-specific policy checks. mike
