Dean Roehrich <Dean.Roehrich at sun.com> writes: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:23:10PM -0500, James Carlson wrote: > >> Final checks should be on the gate, as you say, but giving the end >> developer tools to make nice clean changes in the first place (rather >> than bashing his head against a recalcitrant gate) is the point of >> "wx" and the cdm extensions. > > Sure. > > So the piece we're missing...the gate-side piece which repeats at least some > parts of comchk. Given Rich's earlier comment, I guess no one has looked at > doing this?
I looked into doing this a while ago, but current priorities are such that it's not near the top of the list (though, of course, that may change). -- Rich
